<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrong Again Jemele Hill&#8230; Wrong Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filteringcraig.com/2008/12/05/wrong-again-jemele-hill-wrong-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filteringcraig.com/2008/12/05/wrong-again-jemele-hill-wrong-again/</link>
	<description>Where all the kids want to meet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:48:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: areyouserious</title>
		<link>http://www.filteringcraig.com/2008/12/05/wrong-again-jemele-hill-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6677</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouserious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filteringcraig.com/?p=1339#comment-6677</guid>
		<description>Police do deserve the benefit of the doubt but how so in this case? There is right and wrong, there is common sense and ignorance. While I don&#039;t think it needed to be used in her arguement for Burress (totaly different level), that was a foul case AND YOU KNOW IT!  My definition of using the race card: when a minority regardless of color uses race in a bogus situation (as a get out of jail free card), and I hate it. So whats worse than using the race card? Looking the other way or coming to some BS rationalization when race is obviously the issue (as you did). Don&#039;t diminish the travesty that was the Sean Bell case to make you point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Police do deserve the benefit of the doubt but how so in this case? There is right and wrong, there is common sense and ignorance. While I don&#8217;t think it needed to be used in her arguement for Burress (totaly different level), that was a foul case AND YOU KNOW IT!  My definition of using the race card: when a minority regardless of color uses race in a bogus situation (as a get out of jail free card), and I hate it. So whats worse than using the race card? Looking the other way or coming to some BS rationalization when race is obviously the issue (as you did). Don&#8217;t diminish the travesty that was the Sean Bell case to make you point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiddicus</title>
		<link>http://www.filteringcraig.com/2008/12/05/wrong-again-jemele-hill-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>kiddicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filteringcraig.com/?p=1339#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d never heard of her before today.  I was a happier person then.

thanks, jerk.

I understand these &quot;journalists&quot; get paid to voice their opinion, but how long before the person signing her paycheck realizes &quot;shit, this lady is a blithering idiot&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never heard of her before today.  I was a happier person then.</p>
<p>thanks, jerk.</p>
<p>I understand these &#8220;journalists&#8221; get paid to voice their opinion, but how long before the person signing her paycheck realizes &#8220;shit, this lady is a blithering idiot&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filteringcraig.com/2008/12/05/wrong-again-jemele-hill-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5972</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filteringcraig.com/?p=1339#comment-5972</guid>
		<description>I initially became a non-fan of Jamel Hill when she would consistently bash the Cavs during their finals run of 07 on Espn.  Once I discovered her columns on espn.com, I knew that I had not made a rash decision. She is an aggravating writer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initially became a non-fan of Jamel Hill when she would consistently bash the Cavs during their finals run of 07 on Espn.  Once I discovered her columns on espn.com, I knew that I had not made a rash decision. She is an aggravating writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waiting For Next Year &#187; Some More Interim Linky Love</title>
		<link>http://www.filteringcraig.com/2008/12/05/wrong-again-jemele-hill-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5969</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting For Next Year &#187; Some More Interim Linky Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filteringcraig.com/?p=1339#comment-5969</guid>
		<description>[...] Plaxico Burress is still big news.  The Big Lead is into finding ways of defending him while I took an opportunity to slam Jemele Hill without getting my WFNY brethren in any trouble by writing it under a WFNY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plaxico Burress is still big news.  The Big Lead is into finding ways of defending him while I took an opportunity to slam Jemele Hill without getting my WFNY brethren in any trouble by writing it under a WFNY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
