http://www.filteringcraig.com/2006/07/26/sam-fulwood-iii-misses-the-point-on-browns-vs-woio-news/ Where all the kids want to meet! Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:06:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.filteringcraig.com/2006/07/26/sam-fulwood-iii-misses-the-point-on-browns-vs-woio-news/#comment-3557 Chris Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:49:08 +0000 http://www.craiglyndall.com/?p=895#comment-3557 It will be interesting to see if a civil court thinks poor taste violates the terms of their contract. It will be interesting to see if a civil court thinks poor taste violates the terms of their contract.

]]> http://www.filteringcraig.com/2006/07/26/sam-fulwood-iii-misses-the-point-on-browns-vs-woio-news/#comment-3556 FilteringCraig Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:55:58 +0000 http://www.craiglyndall.com/?p=895#comment-3556 We agree on everything 100%. It is totally legal as a part of the public record. Just in poor taste from my (and Randy Lerner's) point of view. We agree on everything 100%. It is totally legal as a part of the public record. Just in poor taste from my (and Randy Lerner’s) point of view.

]]> http://www.filteringcraig.com/2006/07/26/sam-fulwood-iii-misses-the-point-on-browns-vs-woio-news/#comment-3555 Chris Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:48:05 +0000 http://www.craiglyndall.com/?p=895#comment-3555 Fulwood's argument is dopey class warfare BS, so I'll ignore it. But to your question: I think it's defensible to air the recording because it's a public account of what actually happened. I'd rather my news channel not air it, but that's a matter of preference, not propriety. Fulwood’s argument is dopey class warfare BS, so I’ll ignore it. But to your question: I think it’s defensible to air the recording because it’s a public account of what actually happened. I’d rather my news channel not air it, but that’s a matter of preference, not propriety.

]]>