Net Neutrality - Letter to My Senators

June 30, 2006 · Filed Under Politics 

(I have never written a letter to any politician before today. Here is the letter I sent.)

Dear Sir,

I am quite concerned about the stagnation of the Net Neutrality discussions in the Senate. I think that keeping the Internet Free from unnecessary regulation is one of the most deceivingly pressing matters that has been raised in a while. It is a complicated issue, but what isn’t complicated is what is at stake. What is at stake is the potential innovation, and subsequent revenue, profits, jobs and shareholder value that could be created with a free Internet.

If this government allows phone companies and other Internet service providers to impose a system of special treatment to the highest bidder on the Internet, then this government has failed its people, because the Internet is like the American dream itself.

Individuals who are willing to tinker around and try to invent things have been able to create a lot of value for the world by having the Internet be free from specialized treatment. Without this freedom, we wouldn’t have Ebay, Amazon.com, Craigslist, or even Google.

Just think about the amount of value that those companies provide alone. And now think about the value of the dreams that those companies provide to kids learning computers everywhere. Every one of them believes that if they have a good idea, they can help people, and make a living doing it by providing an innovative service on the Internet.

If you allow phone companies and other Internet service providers to designate a “fast lane” for certain types of traffic, you are stifling this potential innovation, potential future shareholder value, and the dreams of these people who might someday create the next great service or product.

I know that the phone companies and ISP’s like to claim that there is a lot of innovation and money involved on their end in running their business, but they are clearly outnumbered by the amount of innovation that has taken place on the user side of things. Users think up an idea, implement on a smaller scale and are then acquired by larger companies to help scale to larger audiences. Without Net Neutrality, these ideas never come to be.

The only result of this is that ISP’s will be allowed to segregate the rich companies from the poor ones, regardless of who has the best idea. This isn’t good for anyone except the ISP’s who stand to put more money in their pockets even though they aren’t providing anything different in terms of service.

So please understand this issue and fight to make sure that the Internet stays free. The potential innovators in this country depend on it. This country’s competitiveness with the rest of the world depends on it.

I appreciate your time.

Regards,
FilteringCraig

Comments

One Response to “Net Neutrality - Letter to My Senators”

  1. kiddicus maximus on June 30th, 2006 12:42 pm

    dude. i hope you didn’t really sign it FilteringCraig… they’ll think you’re a commie.

Leave a Reply




Sideblog feed

  • FreeTheAirwaves.org Tuesday, 19 August 2008, 7:51 am
    Google has a vested business interest in this project, but I am rooting for them anyway.  Google wants to take that unused fuzzy space between TV channels and broadcast internet signals all over the. […]
  • Browns vs. Giants - Preseason Game 2 Live Blog at WFNY Monday, 18 August 2008, 4:19 pm
    The nice guys over at Waiting for Next Year are going to be live-blogging their event in a chat room over at their site.  I am a geek, and will be joining them.  Come on over.
  • Dan Gilbert is My Hero Sunday, 10 August 2008, 5:46 am
    Cleveland Cavaliers owner on all the LeBron James rumors, ”The reason this thing is where it’s at,” Gilbert said, ”is that we’ve got a bunch of bored, East Coast sports writers who have noth. […]
  • LeBron to Europe? I Don’t Think So Thursday, 7 August 2008, 4:22 am
    So, while the major media continues to plot LeBron’s departure from Cleveland, there is a sane voice out there letting everyone know how unlikely the most outlandish scenarios truly are.
  • Top Gun 2???!?!?!??!?!? Wednesday, 23 July 2008, 5:50 am
    According to reports, the plot outline is, (wait for it) “The idea is Maverick is at the Top Gun school as an instructor — and this time it is he who has to deal with a cocky new female pilot.”
  • Be Afraid Utah Tuesday, 22 July 2008, 7:26 am
    Carlos Boozer is a snake and one of the most dishonorable people in professional sports history. I guess I am not over this just yet.
  • How much you wanna bet… Thursday, 3 July 2008, 9:18 pm
    That this 4-day work week will actually increase the amount of gasoline that these employees will be using?  Instead of commuting to work, they will now be going to the grocery store, going to do som. […]
  • In-Car DVD Players are Stupid Thursday, 26 June 2008, 10:15 am
    At least they will be when we get a load of in-car wifi!!!!! (I am such a geek.)
  • George Carlin is Gone Monday, 23 June 2008, 4:34 am
    I once bet a guy in college that I could watch a George Carlin special on HBO without laughing. I did it, but it wasn’t at all easy. There is going to be a void left by Carlin dying.
  • Accepted Behaviors Tend to Increase Thursday, 19 June 2008, 12:15 pm
    If you become too accepting of a condition that you really don’t want to encourage, you might just end up with unintended consequences.






Who Links Here